• Home
  • Services
    • Initial Bridge Assessment
  • Amazing Pros
  • Contact
  • Diary of a Bridge Pro
  • Calendar
  • Instructional
  • Links
  • Book a Meeting
  • Home
  • Services
    • Initial Bridge Assessment
  • Amazing Pros
  • Contact
  • Diary of a Bridge Pro
  • Calendar
  • Instructional
  • Links
  • Book a Meeting
WILSONOVICH BRIDGE SERVICES
  • Home
  • Services
    • Initial Bridge Assessment
  • Amazing Pros
  • Contact
  • Diary of a Bridge Pro
  • Calendar
  • Instructional
  • Links
  • Book a Meeting

    BRIAN GLUBOK

    Brian is a highly accomplished American bridge player hailing from New York City. Glubok, an alumnus of Amherst College, has consistently excelled in North American Bridge Championships, securing numerous titles, including wins in the Jacoby Open Swiss Teams, Reisinger, and Spingold events. In addition to his domestic success, Glubok came close to victory in the World Mixed Pairs Championship in 2010, finishing as the runner-up..

    Archives

    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024

    Categories

    All
    Brian Glubok

    RSS Feed

Back to Blog

Diary of a Bridge Pro #35

8/31/2024

 
I'm numbering this blog #35 to leave room to make #33 into two columns. Naturally as a
frustrated novelist I tend to write long, but for this medium - short is good.


Let me get the bridge hand in early, before I start talking about my Up Against the Wall Advice
Straight Outta Compton.

Here was a hand I featured recently from that very ballroom: AQJT, A, KQxxx, Axx - facing
K98xxxx, Qx, Ax, Jx - Walter and I reached 7 Spades quickly, with an invitational jump shift.
Here's a link to the diagram - I was responder.
Picture
​The hand in question is what we used to call a “baby grand slam” - or, for short, a baby grand.

If you want to buy a baby grand piano from Aaron Silverstein’s in-laws, click here.

If you want to look at a deal where the offense (Walter and I in this case) has a gazillion tricks - a baby grand in bridge terms - then check the diagram.

Our respective hands were: K98xxxx, Qx, Ax, Jt facing AQJT, A, KQ9xx, Axx - I look at a pair of hands like this and I think: Seven spade tricks, four diamond tricks (assuming a 4-2 split - five tricks if the suit splits 3-3 - only three tricks if the suit splits 5-1) - then I add the heart trick (gotta count the ace) and then a second heart trick, in the form of a ruff in the AQJT hand, likely the dummy - that’s an eighth spade trick if you prefer to count that way - just don’t count it both as an eighth spade and a second heart - oh yeah, ace of clubs, too - so basically this is a fourteen or fifteen trick deal -

*****


This pair of hands can be handled very easily, the point count is even adequate if both players
use basic evaluation techniques. The opener can reason: This 20-count re-evaluates to 22 or 23
(all those aces, good five card suit, great trumps) - and the responders ten count re-evaluates to
15 on account of the three extra spades (one for the fifth, two for the sixth, two for the seventh) -
so the straight-forward point-count approach gets you to 37 or 38 points - with all the aces, the
long suit, and the singleton, that’s why there are fifteen likely tricks.

Chalk Talk:

After we bid, with the opponents silent, One Diamond - One Spade, Three Hearts by opener is
what is known as an “Idle Sequence”. This is because the “natural” meaning for the bid - a good
hand with primary diamonds and secondary hearts - has no utility. (This is not really true - you
could play the bid to show a hand like x, AKJxx, AQJTxxx, void).

With a normal excellent hand like Kx, AJ9x, AKTxxx, K, we simply bid 1D - 1S - 2H - this is
known as a “‘reverse”, and is generally played as promising extra strength - the thinking being:
Responder will have to go to the 3 level to return to opener’s primary suit (diamonds), so
Opener needs substantial extra strength (17+) to justify his reverse bid.

Many expert partnerships use this 3H bid as a “mini-splinter” - a hand like KJxx, x, AJxxx, AJx
- others use it as a “Non-specific game splinter” - either AQxx, x, AKxxx, KJx or AQxx, KJx,
AKxxx, x - then on the third round they use a relay ask/answer method to pin-point the
singleton.

I prefer a different meaning: I treat this 3H bid (and 3S, after 1D - 1H), as showing: “The
biggest possible game raise; nearly a 2 Club bid in support” - hands like KQxx, Axx, AKxxxx,
void, or AJxx, Ax, AKJxx, Ax - or the actual hand from my regional with Walter, AQJT, A, KQxxx,
Axx)

*****

So here’s a good auction for Standard Bidders using this gadget: 1D - 1S - 3H - 4NT - Answer
showing three keys - 7 Spades.

Here’s another good sequence, the one Walter and I relied upon: 1D - 2S (invitational
jump-shift, shows 9-11 HCP and at least six spades) - RKC - Answer showing two - Seven
Spades.

Despite the apparent ease of reaching the grand slam (we do, after all, have a likely 15 tricks
off the top), reaching 7 was worth over 90% of the matchpoints - even reaching six gets you an
above average score.

I’ll suggest to Walter and perhaps to WCN that we add an Optional Key Card bid to that
sequence, specifically: 1D - 2S - 4C - then responder answers:

4S: Bad hand for slam
4D: Fair hand for slam - what do you think?
4H: Good hand for slam, I’m answering with the first step, showing that number of key-cards
​
*****

Thought for the Day:

90% of life is just showing up. The other half is what you wear when you get there.

​Life: Be in it!

0 Comments
Read More



Leave a Reply.

Site powered by Weebly. Managed by Page One Agency