BRIAN GLUBOKBrian is a highly accomplished American bridge player hailing from New York City. Glubok, an alumnus of Amherst College, has consistently excelled in North American Bridge Championships, securing numerous titles, including wins in the Jacoby Open Swiss Teams, Reisinger, and Spingold events. In addition to his domestic success, Glubok came close to victory in the World Mixed Pairs Championship in 2010, finishing as the runner-up.. Archives
October 2024
Categories |
Back to Blog
Diary of a Bridge Pro #308/27/2024 Springfield, Illinois - April 14 The weather this week continues to cover a wide range - I notice, because I go everywhere by bike. Yesterday, Thursday, offered up a cold dawn, a chilly morning, a pleasant afternoon, a brief but severe rainstorm with high gusty winds, and then a glorious early evening featuring a sunset of majestic purple hues. I’d like to talk about Goethe, but I keep getting diverted by thoughts of this famous incident from 1985 where Bobby Knight, basketball coach for Indiana, got worked up and threw a chair: Like Bobby Knight, the same could be said of Glubok: "I can get a little intense sometimes." ***** I've learned a ton from this endeavor in the month since I began writing this blog.. For one thing, I never knew what a polymath was before. For those of you who can't or don't want to click on the link: The Definition of Polymath: An individual with a broad range of knowledge on a broad range of subjects - a Renaissance type. Yesterday I surprised myself when I managed both to attend the potluck dinner at the Discovery House across the street, and also to contribute a couple of pounds of coleslaw (doctors and nutritionists both recommend coleslaw) and one of cucumber salad from the Country Market on Second Street. I’m not a big “group activity guy” - at least I haven’t been, in the past. Potlucks are fun, though - you can’t go wrong in attending, really. I want to heartily recommend the institution to all and sundry, now that I've attended one.. Things Potlucks Have Going For Them: 1) Everybody has a good time 2) There is an absence of pretense 3) The range of food is so wide that you are sure to find something you like 4) The crowd is very likely to be a mix of people, some you already know and others too 5) Group activities in general are very worthwhile - we all need these more than ever, post-2020 - the need or desire for group activity is one of the reasons I'm glad to have resumed playing F2F bridge. Executive Summary: Group activities that feature food: Really good! ***** Speaking of eating with other people, I sojourned downtown yesterday to Sixth Street Cafe. There, I ate a late breakfast and had a marvelous experience discussing Catcher in the Rye with a young local who had just begun reading the book when I met him in that same spot a few weeks previous, and by yesterday had recently finished it. We spoke of the reclusive J. D. Salinger, and I recounted some macabre details of his short story, A Beautiful Day for Bananafish. Reading Catcher, my young friend was struck by just how angry Holden was - "Why was he so angry?" he wanted to know. I explained that he was angry at his mother for dying, and we both recalled that he was angry at his brother, the writer, for "selling out and going to Hollywood, with all the other phonies". Then he was angry at his roommate for having gross habits, and angry at a former teacher on Sutton Place for trying to get intimate with him. We talked about fancy prep schools like the one Holden attended, Pencey Prep - the Pencey campus, even though entirely fictional, likely resembled the one where I did my undergraduate studies: Amherst College, in western Massachusetts. Here's how Amherst is branding themselves today: https://www.amherst.edu/about When it comes to re-invention, we could all learn a lot from these guys. ***** Goethe, that pioneering polymath, is said to have said: "Beginnings have a magic within them. Begin something!" Last month I began this blog, and my bridge agency. My thoughts turn once more to bridge legend Alvin Roth: Roth, what have I wrought? Let's have a bridge hand. My recent trip to Florida offers many candidates, here's one from my two days there playing with Wall Street Walter. Consider the deal from Walter's perspective: AT8x, AQxx, J, AKJ9 -The bidding proceeds One Diamond on your left, pass by partner (Your side vulnerable, they're not), one spade on your right - naturally you double. After (1D) - P - (1S) - ?, a take-out double with this hand is totally auto - you have the requisite four-four in the unbid suits, and an ace-and-a-half more than a minimum - Your RHO passes, denying as many as three spades in the modern game (so tending to show precisely two) - your partner calls 2 Clubs, your RHO competes with Two Diamonds - You have four clubs and a stiff diamond, so you have more than you need to offer a competitive raise to 3C, so you do. Opener competes to 3 Diamonds, and this is passed back to you. The bidding to date: (1D) - P - (1S) - Double (You) - (Pass) - Two Clubs (Partner) - (2D) - 3C - (3D) - P - P - ? ***** I'm going to assert here that you have to bid either Four Clubs or double - Walter elected to pass - in my partnership with Walter, in competitive auctions, our side has often suffered from this sort of error (under-competing). In case you’re curious, here are the home pages for the institutions of higher education which Walter attended, Cornell and Colubmia: Cornell University https://www.cornell.edu/ Columbia University https://www.columbia.edu/ ***** My years at Amherst (1978-82) marked a transitional period in American higher education, especially in what was then sometimes known as instruction in the liberal arts, or alternatively as simply, "The Humanities". While most academies, and the majority of larger state institutions of higher learning, concentrated on instruction in the "hard sciences" (engineering and the like), places like Amherst and a handful of others were known as being "Strong in the Humanities" - they took great institutional pride in their departments of English and Sociology, sometimes known as "The Social Sciences". By the time I attended, less pride was taken - it was the early 1980’s, and we were at the beginning of a sullen era, the tail end of a hopeful one. The country, and my college, were transitioning from Aquarian to Reptilian, one might argue, but perhaps that’s applying too fine a point. By the time I arrived, I already had aspirations as a writer. When I returned for my junior yeyar, after a leave of absence, I switched majors from History to English. This led to my having a new Academic Adviser, one G. Armour Craig. I didn’t appreciate G. Armour at the time - scion to the slaughterhouse family, he had matriculated at Amherst in the 30’s - he loved the place, and spent his working years there, then in his seventies, when I was assigned as his charge, he remained on the faculty, even taught a course or two. Campus legend held that for most of his career there he waived his salary and simply collected $1 a year. He loved literature, and learning. but he was from an era way previous to my own. I mean, this guy was older than Kaplan (b. 1925), maybe as old or older than Roth (b. 1914) - our generation gap wasn't a crevice, it was a chasm. I do recall my one encounter with him, where he discussed with me my academic progress. He was genuinely interested in my education and my progress, and supportive of my desire to write. He was old school but not a stuffed shirt, and I feel I was remiss not to make way more use of all he had to offer to me in terms of sage counsel. I felt at the time that I had no time on my hands - I could point out here that during that period I was managing to win the NY GNT's every year (1981-84) and I think it’s fair to say that I was far from diligent about my studies. So it doesn't surprise me now to recall that I didn't make use of the office appointments with him which I was entitled to - I was probably relieved to be able to postpone and dodge them altogether, with this one exception. It was a sunny spring afternoon. "So, what do you think of Goethe?" G. Armour asked of me as we sat in his large, shared office in Johnson Chapel. Clearly he lived the literary life, which I had some interest in - but at the time I had way more interest in City Life, and in the card-players life, and bridge. "I'm not sure I'm familiar with him," I must have acknowledged - I recall vaguely that I might have been assigned one of his books, in one of my courses, but I also recall that I hadn't even cracked the cover open - possibly I never even bought the thing, much less read it. "Good God, man!” G. Armour exclaimed to me, appalled. “You mean to tell me that you've
never read Goethe?"
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |
RSS Feed
